Cost of Living in Illinois vs. Texas

Cost of Living in Illinois vs. Texas: Illinois and Texas are two of the largest state economies and frequently compete for residents, employers, and investment. IL combines a high-cost global city in Chicago with more affordable downstate communities, while TX has become a migration magnet led by Austin, Dallas, Houston, and San Antonio. For households, the key question is not only who pays more, but where paychecks perform better. This article uses 2025 to 2026 data on wages, housing, taxes, and everyday expenses to provide a practical, numbers-driven comparison of the cost of living in Illinois vs. Texas.

Key Takeaways

1. Illinois has a cost of living index in the mid 90s, while Texas sits in the low 90s, making the latter considerably affordable overall.
2. Texas has no state income tax, while Illinois applies a flat 4.95 percent rate, creating several thousand dollars of annual tax difference for middle and upper incomes.
3. Median home prices are similar statewide, but Chicago lifts Illinois averages, while Texas offers a broader range of moderately priced metros and suburbs.
4. Property taxes are high in both states, commonly around 1.6 to 2.0 percent of home value, so mortgage affordability must include taxes.
5. Homeowners insurance tends to be higher in Texas, especially in hail and hurricane exposed regions, while Illinois has more moderate but rising premiums.
6. Childcare and healthcare costs are broadly comparable, but specific cities can be significantly cheaper or more expensive within each state.
7. Migration trends favor Texas, which continues to gain residents, while Illinois has seen persistent net outmigration in recent years.

Related article

15 Best Cities for Families in Texas

There are many employment opportunities throughout the state and many enjoyable communities to call home. We’ve compiled a list of 15 cities that rank high in education, affordability, and safety; areas of interest for many potential homeowners…

At-a-Glance Comparison

1. Living Wage Comparison

MIT living wage estimates suggest a single adult with no children in Illinois needs about 24.40 dollars per hour, or roughly 50,000 dollars per year, to cover basic necessities including housing, food, transportation, and healthcare. Texas is slightly lower, with a single adult living wage around the high 23 dollar range per hour, or about 49,000 dollars annually. Statewide figures hide large differences between Chicago and downstate Illinois, and between Texas high-cost metros and smaller towns.

For families, the gap grows. Single parents with one child in Illinois typically need an hourly wage in the low 40s, while an equivalent parent in Texas can often manage below that. Two working adults with a couple of children in Illinois may need a combined income near 90,000 to 100,000 dollars to meet basic needs, with Texas households generally requiring a few thousand dollars less for a comparable standard of living.

Minimum wages fall short of these levels in both states. The Prairie State has been phasing in a statewide minimum that reaches roughly 15 dollars per hour in 2026, narrowing the difference between minimum and living wages but not closing it. The Lone Star State uses the federal 7.25 dollar minimum, far below the living wage in any metro, meaning low-wage workers there rely more on multiple earners, overtime, or shared housing to match basic costs.

Related article

What to Know About Parking in Chicago, Illinois

Drivers need to know which options are available, what the rules and regulations say about parking, and where to go when traveling with a car. Knowing these things will mitigate any potential issues that arise. Luckily, Chicago has many options for people who know where to look…

2. Housing Costs

Housing is usually a substantial line item in a household budget and a major driver of cost differences between these rival areas.

A. Home Prices: Illinois statewide median home prices sit in the low 300,000 dollar range. Chicago and its collar counties are above this level, while many downstate markets, notably Rockford, Peoria, and Springfield, offer homes between about 150,000 and 250,000 dollars. The statewide number blends an expensive metro and far more affordable interior counties.

Texas statewide median home prices are in the mid 300,000 dollar range. Austin often exceeds 450,000 dollars, while Dallas, Houston, and San Antonio are somewhat lower. Smaller cities and rural counties can be more economical than this median. Buyers with flexibility on location can find similarly priced homes in both states, but Texas offers more fast-growing suburbs with still moderate prices.

B. Renting: Illinois renters pay an average of roughly 1,300 to 1,500 dollars per month for a one-bedroom. Central Chicago neighborhoods sit above this range, while pre-war buildings and smaller cities are lower. For renters who can live outside Chicago proper, costs can be trimmed.

Texas renters pay around 1,150 to 1,350 dollars statewide for a one-bedroom. Austin and the most desirable parts of Dallas and Houston run higher, while smaller cities often offer rents below 1,000 dollars. Overall, Texas provides slightly cheaper average rent, though parts of Austin and other hotbeds can feel as expensive as Chicago’s trendier neighborhoods.

C. Homeowners Insurance: Homeowners insurance is where Texas often loses ground. Illinois homeowners typically pay 2,200 to 2,800 dollars per year. Risk comes mainly from winter storms, occasional flooding, and severe thunderstorms, but catastrophic events are less frequent than in coastal states.

Texas homeowners commonly pay 3,000 to 3,800 dollars or more annually, especially in coastal counties, hail-prone North Texas, and tornado-exposed regions. Hurricanes, tropical storms, hail, and high winds increase claim costs and reinsurance prices, which shows up in premiums. For two identical 350,000 dollar homes, the insurance difference can easily reach 1,000 to 1,500 dollars per year in Texas, which offsets part of its tax advantage.

D. Property Taxes: Both states depend heavily on property taxes. Illinois often ranks near the top nationally, with effective rates around 2.0 percent or higher in many suburbs and even some rural counties. A 350,000 dollar home taxed at 2.0 percent generates about 7,000 dollars per year in property tax.

Texas also has high property taxes, with many counties falling between 1.6 and 1.8 percent. On a 350,000 dollar home, this means 5,600 to 6,300 dollars annually before exemptions. Homestead and senior exemptions can lower taxable values, despite property taxes remaining substantial. When comparing states, property taxes and insurance must be considered together with mortgage payments, not just purchase price.

Related article

12 Key Factors to Know When Living in Dallas, Texas

The city is the 9th largest in the United States. Dallas Texas is a little bit country, a little bit rock ’n’ roll, and a whole lot of history, arts, culture and business in the center of the fourth-largest metropolitan statistical area in the United…

3. Economy and Taxes

A. Economic Landscape: Illinois’ economy is diverse. Chi-Town anchors finance, logistics, professional services, higher education, and healthcare, while manufacturing and agriculture remain important in downstate regions. Job and population growth have been slower than in some peers, and pension obligations weigh on state finances, but metropolis offers a deep labor market.

Texas’ economy has expanded quickly, fueled by energy, technology, advanced manufacturing, logistics, and a broad service sector. Its major metros regularly rank among leaders in job growth and corporate relocations. Median household incomes in Illinois and Texas are similar, in the low 80,000 dollar range, but their seismic population and job growth provide more headroom for career moves and entrepreneurial ventures.

B. Tax Comparison

Illinois taxes wages and many investment returns at the 4.95 percent flat rate. A 100,000 dollar income incurs about 4,950 dollars of state income tax, rising to roughly 7,425 dollars at 150,000 dollars and 9,900 dollars at 200,000 dollars. Texas levies no state income tax, meaning households keep that portion of their earnings.

Texas residents often pay slightly higher property taxes and sometimes higher combined sales tax rates, but for high earners, the income tax savings usually dominate. A household earning 150,000 to 200,000 dollars can easily see 6,000 to 10,000 dollars of annual tax savings in Texas compared with Illinois, even after accounting for higher property tax or insurance in some counties. Lower-income households see smaller absolute differences, and for renters, income tax savings may be offset by other costs.

4. Safety

Statewide crime data show both Illinois and Texas close to national averages, with important internal variation. Illinois violent crime rates sit in the high 200s per 100,000 residents, and property crime is around 1,700 per 100,000. Chicago accounts for a large share of violent incidents, while many suburbs and smaller cities report much lower rates.

Texas violent and property crime rates are somewhat higher on average, influenced by metros of Houston and Dallas amid rapid growth in certain suburbs. Both have experienced declines in homicide and other serious crimes since the early pandemic years, reflecting broader national trends.

Because statewide averages blur differences, relocation decisions should rely on city and neighborhood-level data. Both states offer very safe suburbs and towns, as well as neighborhoods where crime is a meaningful concern. Comparing specific ZIP codes, rather than just states, is essential for an accurate view of safety.

5. Climate and Geography

Illinois has four distinct seasons. Winters are punishing, particularly in northern Illinois, and heating costs are significant. Summers are pristine, with occasional heat waves and severe thunderstorms. Spring and fall are variable but can be very pleasant. Weather-related costs show up mainly in heating, winter maintenance, and occasional flood or storm damage.

Texas spans several climate zones. North and central Texas see long, hot summers and mild winters. The Gulf Coast is humid, with heavy rain and hurricanes, while West Texas is hot and dry. Air conditioning is nearly universal and runs for a large portion of the year, raising electricity usage. Weather risks like hurricanes, hail, and flooding have direct impacts on insurance and infrastructure. Households must decide whether they prefer cold winters and fewer major storms or heat and greater exposure to severe weather.

Related article

The 5 Best Places to Live in Illinois: A City Comparison

Illinois blends world-class cities, small-town charm, and rich farmland, offering diverse lifestyles across the Prairie State. This guide highlights the five best Illinois cities to live, based on affordability, opportunity, safety, and quality of life, from Chicago’s vibrancy to Urbana-Champaign’s academic appeal in the heart of the Midwest.

6. Education

Illinois is a mid to upper tier education state. Many suburban districts around Chicago and university communities such as Champaign, Urbana, and Naperville post commendable test scores and graduation rates, often above 85 percent. Per-pupil spending exceeds the national average, though funding gaps between property-rich and property-poor districts persist.

Texas presents a wider range of outcomes. Suburbs of Dallas, Austin, Houston, and San Antonio host some of the highest-rated school districts in the country, but rural and lower-income districts face ongoing challenges. Overall spending per pupil is near or slightly below the national average, and the state has invested heavily in accountability and standardized testing. Texas has also expanded school choice options, with charter schools and limited vouchers in some areas.

In higher education, Illinois offers the University of Illinois system and highly-ranked private institutions led by the University of Chicago and Northwestern University. In-state tuition at the flagship campus is in the low to mid teens in thousands of dollars per year. Texas residents have access to the University of Texas system, Texas A&M, and a broad network of regional campuses. Many charge high single-digit to low double-digit thousands in annual tuition. Expenditures vary by campus, but both states provide strong public university options.

7. Childcare

Childcare costs are substantial in both states. In Illinois, center-based infant care often costs about 1,100 to 1,200 dollars per month, or 13,000 to 14,000 dollars per year. Preschool programs are affordable, frequently in the 9,000 to 11,000 dollar annual range. Chicago and inner suburbs sit at the higher end, while smaller cities and rural areas cost less.

Texas infant care in centers commonly ranges from 900 to 1,100 dollars per month, with preschool rates lower. ATX and some Dallas and Houston neighborhoods approach or exceed Illinois urban prices, whereas lower-cost markets are more common elsewhere in the state. On a statewide basis, the difference between Illinois and Texas is measured in a few thousand dollars per year for a two-child family, not in tens of thousands.

Illinois Child Care Assistance Program and Texas Workforce and CCDF-based subsidies support qualifying families, but most middle-income households pay market rates. For many, the decision between Illinois and Texas will rely more on long-term housing and tax costs than on modest differences in childcare pricing.

Related article

7 Most Affordable Places to Live in Illinois

Illinois offers more than its big cities and farmland, it’s also one of the Midwest’s most affordable states. With low median home prices and a diverse economy, it attracts families, retirees, and remote workers alike. This guide reveals seven budget-friendly Illinois communities for 2026, balancing cost, comfort, and Midwestern charm…

8. Healthcare

Illinois expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act, which reduced its uninsured rate and broadened coverage for low-income adults. Residents can also buy subsidized ACA Marketplace plans, and major hospital systems in Chicago, Springfield, and other metros provide extensive networks of specialists. Rural access remains more limited but generally stronger than in many non-expansion states.

Texas has not expanded Medicaid, leaving many low-income adults in a coverage gap where they earn too much for traditional Medicaid but too little to afford full-price private coverage. The state has one of the highest uninsured rates in the country, especially among working-age adults. ACA Marketplace plans are available, with locals receiving subsidies, but the overall safety net is thinner than in Illinois. For households with complex medical needs or unstable employment, Illinois often offers more predictable coverage; for those with strong employer-provided insurance, the difference may matter less.

9. Additional Cost Considerations

1. Utilities: Illinois households pay more for winter heating but less for long-duration air conditioning. Texas households often face higher annual electricity usage because of extended summer heat, even when per-kilowatt-hour rates are similar. Essentially, total annual utility bills can be higher in Texas despite warmer winters.
2. Gas Prices: Gas prices in Illinois tend to be slightly above national averages due to state and local fuel taxes. Texas prices are usually somewhat lower, thanks to local refining capacity and lower taxes. Over a year, a typical driver might save a few hundred dollars on fuel in Texas, which helps but does not outweigh larger housing or tax differences.
3. Groceries: Cost of groceries in both states hover near national levels. Illinois may be marginally higher in Chicago and lower in some rural areas. Texas average grocery costs can be modestly lower, especially where warehouse clubs and discount chains are common. The annual difference for a family food budget is usually a few hundred dollars rather than a major driver of relocation decisions.
4. Transportation: Both states are car dependent. Chicago CTA and Metra systems allow some households to live with a single or zero vehicle(s), which can meaningfully reduce costs. Texas metros have expanding transit systems, but most households still rely on cars. Auto insurance premiums can be higher in some Texas metros than in comparable Illinois suburbs, adding another incremental cost for Texas drivers.

Conclusion

Illinois and Texas offer distinct cost profiles with clear tradeoffs. Texas is modestly cheaper overall, mainly due to zero income tax and slightly lower average living costs, but high property taxes and insurance narrow that advantage. Illinois imposes higher taxes yet provides expanded Medicaid, robust services, and Chicago’s deep job market and amenities. High earners often benefit most in Texas, while families prioritizing specific schools, transit, or Midwestern climate may accept Illinois’ higher tax bill.

FAQs About the Cost of Living in Illinois vs. Texas

1. Is Texas really that much cheaper than Illinois in 2026?

Texas is lenient economically, but not dramatically so. Cost of living indices place Texas in the low 90s and Illinois in the mid 90s on a 100-point national scale. The biggest gaps are in-state income tax and some housing-related costs. Texans pay no state income tax, which can save thousands of dollars annually for higher earners. However, high property taxes and homeowners insurance, especially in storm-prone areas, offset part of that benefit. For many middle-income households, the total cost difference is meaningful but not decisive alone.

2. How much salary do you need in Texas to match an Illinois lifestyle?

Many households can maintain a similar lifestyle in Texas with about 90 to 95 percent of the income needed in Illinois. A family that needs 100,000 dollars in a Chicago suburb might require roughly 90,000 to 95,000 dollars in a comparable Texas metro. This reflects lower state tax burdens and slightly lower average housing and utility costs. City choice matters. Austin can be nearly as expensive as Chicago, while more moderately priced metros or smaller cities can allow similar lifestyles at even lower incomes.

3. Which state is better for retirees in 2026?

Retirees with significant pensions or investment income often favor Texas, because that income is not taxed at the state level. Property taxes and insurance remain considerations, but the absence of income tax provides recurring savings. Illinois generally imposes higher overall tax burdens, though it offers expanded Medicaid, strong healthcare systems in major metros, and robust public transit in Chicago. Retirees focused on after-tax income usually lean toward Texas. Those prioritizing healthcare access, transit, or Midwestern climate may find Illinois worth the extra cost.

4. Are people still leaving Illinois for Texas in 2026?

Yes. Illinois continues to see net outmigration, and Texas remains a major destination, driven by lower taxes, job growth, and warmer weather. Some moves go the other direction for job, family, or lifestyle reasons, but overall flows still favor Texas.

5. Which state is better for remote workers in 2026?

Remote workers often find Texas appealing, since high salaries from out-of-state employers are not subject to Texas income tax. Illinois appeals to those who want Chicago’s transit, culture, and networks, but they must accept higher income and property taxes. Net-income-focused remote workers typically prefer TX, while others may prioritize specific Illinois communities and amenities despite higher recurring costs.